Introduction On July 20, 2015, the California Supreme Court issued In re Marriage of Davis, 61 Cal. 4th 846 (2015) (Davis). For the purpose of determining when a couple is “separated” and thus no longer acquiring community property, Davis adopted the reasoning from Norviel1 and construed the phrase “living separate and apart” as requ...
CarolAnn Peterson
Following in the footsteps of England and Wales (2015) and Ireland and Scotland (2019), Ca...
Bero Porter
A divorce can have a significant impact on a family’s financial and emotional well-b...
April C. Ball
Part One of this article covered estate fundamentals— things that a family law attor...
Esther Rosenfeld
California’s already-besieged court system ground to a near halt in March as Governo...
Richard Gould-Saltman
First and foremost, I would like to extend my thanks to our Associate Editor, Debra Frank,...
Marshall W. Waller, CFLS
Welcome to the 21st Century, a wonderful time indeed to experience all that technology has...
Christopher Melcher, CFLS
“Only fools assert that they are free of biases.” (Martindale, D. A., “B...
Richard Gould-Saltman
In Ficke (In re Marriage of Ficke, 13 DJDAR 7438, 6/12/2013) a trial judge apparently deci...
Dawn Gray
In re the Marriage of Veronica and Curtis Priem (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 505, 153 Cal.Rptr.3...
Jessica Dayton
I. Introduction Our traditional notions of how legal system should operate have siloed ar...
Michele Brown, CFLS
Welcome back to “normal!" As we have traversed the Pandemic back to being in-person,...
Seth Goldstein
In this article, in a multi-part series, we discuss several aspects of the errors made by...
Jeffrey A. Travis
Most transactions today are conducted digitally. According to the Federal Reserve, in 2018...
Naghmeh Bashar
Keeping it short and sweet… We have several informative and thought-provoking artic...
Jack Young
Credible appraisal reports must be grounded in established professional standards and prov...